Miller v. California - PDFSEARCH.IO - Document Search Engine

Miller v. California
Results: 111

#	Item
21	No. SO65720 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE O F THE STATE O F CALIFORNIA, ) Plaintiff and Respondent, Add to Reading List Source URL: www.courts.ca.gov Language: English - Date: 2014-07-25 20:22:41 Miller-El v. Dretke Batson v. Kentucky Juries in the United States All-white jury Peremptory challenge Batson Appeal Citation signal Rice v. Collins Law Legal procedure Government
22	IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION VALERIA TANCO and SOPHY JESTY, IJPE DeKOE and THOMAS KOSTURA, KELLIE MILLER and VANESSA Add to Reading List Source URL: www.nclrights.org Language: English - Date: 2014-02-03 19:24:05 Politics of the United States LGBT rights in California Lawrence v. Texas Privacy law Defense of Marriage Act Baker v. Nelson In re Marriage Cases John J. Bursch Law Same-sex marriage in the United States Case law
23	THE ROLE OF COURTS IN THE INITIATIVE PROCESS: A SEARCH FOR STANDARDS KENNETH P. MILLER Department of Political Science University of California at Berkeley Add to Reading List Source URL: www.iandrinstitute.org Language: English - Date: 2014-09-08 07:57:05 United States Politics Direct democracy Elections Initiative Petitions Oregon Supreme Court U.S. Term Limits Inc. v. Thornton California Proposition 8 LGBT rights in California Politics of the United States Same-sex marriage in the United States
24	IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION VALERIA TANCO and SOPHY JESTY, IJPE DeKOE and THOMAS KOSTURA, KELLIE MILLER and VANESSA Add to Reading List Source URL: www.tn.gov Language: English - Date: 2014-09-30 10:11:14 Politics of the United States LGBT rights in California Lawrence v. Texas Privacy law Defense of Marriage Act Baker v. Nelson In re Marriage Cases John J. Bursch Law Same-sex marriage in the United States Case law
25	Title 17: CRIMES Chapter 93-A: OBSCENITY Table of Contents Section[removed]DISSEMINATION OF OBSCENE MATTER TO MINORS.............................. 3 Section[removed]MAGAZINES CONTAINING OBSCENE MATERIAL ON THEIR COVERS NOT T Add to Reading List Source URL: www.mainelegislature.org Language: English - Date: 2014-10-07 04:45:57 Obscenity Patently offensive Miller v. California Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union Obscenity law Censorship Human sexuality
26	Testimony of April Major before the Commission on Online Child Protection (COPA) regarding The Creation of a New Top Level Domain for Adult Content June 8, 2000 Add to Reading List Source URL: www.copacommission.org Language: English - Date: 2013-02-05 12:44:04 Law Miller v. California First Amendment to the United States Constitution Content-control software Obscenity Ginsberg v. New York Communications Decency Act Renton v. Playtime Theatres Inc. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union Censorship Pornography law Sex and the law
27	GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL * ATTORNEY GENERAL Add to Reading List Source URL: oag.dc.gov Language: English - Date: 2014-07-10 13:08:50** Video game censorship Video game content ratings systems Violence in video games Entertainment Software Rating Board Video game controversies Video game content rating system Obscenity Miller v. California Video game Censorship Pornography law Censorship in the United States
28	Filed[removed]P. v. Miller CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule[removed]a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except a Add to Reading List Source URL: www.courts.ca.gov Language: English - Date: 2014-08-21 19:24:21 Evidence law Fault Circumstantial evidence Attempt English criminal law United States federal probation and supervised release Law Criminal law Elements of crime
29	What’s “Different” (Enough) in Eighth Amendment Law? Richard S. Frase∗ In Miller v. Alabama 1 and Jackson v. Hobbs 2 the Supreme Court reaffirmed its conclusions in two earlier cases, Roper v. Simmons 3 and Graha Add to Reading List Source URL: moritzlaw.osu.edu Language: English - Date: 2013-11-29 10:44:10 United States Harmelin v. Michigan Life imprisonment in the United States Ewing v. California Coker v. Georgia Kennedy v. Louisiana Gregg v. Georgia Roper v. Simmons Mitigating factor Case law Law United States criminal procedure
30	T his timeline is part of a packet of materials available from the American Library Association, developed to celebrate the freedom to read. The annual proactive celebration, Banned Books Week, provides the opportunity Add to Reading List Source URL: www.ila.org Language: English - Date: 2012-12-18 10:42:00 First Amendment to the United States Constitution Pornography law Separation of church and state Freedom of speech in the United States Gitlow v. New York Miller v. California Brandenburg v. Ohio Roth v. United States Stromberg v. California Law Case law Censorship

UPDATE